No-algorithm news

What the ranker takes from you.

A ranked feed decides what you see, in what order, and when it ends — which is to say, never. Here's what an algorithm actually costs you, and four honest ways to read without one.

Chronology backA feed that endsRules you can audit
Short answer
Four ways. One that ends.

Direct visits, newsletters, a classic RSS reader, or Muuted — any of the four gets you chronology back and a feed that tells you when you're caught up.

What you lose

Three things you lose to a ranked feed.

Your activity influences what appears, but the ranking system keeps the final vote — and that costs you more than it sounds.

01

Chronology

You can't tell what's new from what's resurfaced to provoke you.

02

Endings

A ranked feed has no bottom; endings are bad for engagement.

03

Control

“Show fewer like this” is a hope, not a rule.

The real options

The non-algorithmic options, honestly

All four work. They differ in how far they scale.

OPTION 1

Visit sites directly

Bookmark ten sites, open them each morning. Free and honest — it just doesn't scale past a handful before you forget some and over-check others.

OPTION 2

Email newsletters

Chronological by nature, writers you trust in your inbox. The weakness is scatter — mixed in with everything else email carries, and unsubscribe is the only mute button.

OPTION 3

A classic RSS reader

The traditional answer, and a good one — Feedly, Inoreader and NewsBlur are all fine choices at roughly $36–99/yr. Here's how they stack up on filtering, which is where they differ most.

Turn the algorithm off where you can

Turn the algorithm off where you can

Before you build anything, some apps you already use have a following-only or newest-first view. Below is what each platform's own help pages said when I checked on October 24, 2026. Where I could not read a step from the official page, I say so instead of guessing. One honest warning first: these views are often buried a few taps down, and some reset on their own, so they are a patch rather than a fix.

Facebook

Open your Feed, tap See More in the left menu, then Feeds. Facebook describes the Feeds tab as the most recent content from people, Favorites, Pages and groups you follow, newest first. Its help page also says the view resets when you leave and reopen the app, and the posts predicted to be most relevant return to the top of your Feed.

Source: Facebook Help Center

YouTube

You can stop your watch history from shaping recommendations. On a computer, go to My Activity at myactivity.google.com/product/youtube, open the Controls tab and select Turn off. On a TV or console, open Settings and choose Pause watch history. That limits what history feeds into suggestions; it does not make your Home page chronological. I could not verify the Subscriptions tab from YouTube's help pages today.

Source: YouTube Help: pause or turn off watch history

Google News

There is no chronological option that I could find. Google's help page describes following topics, locations and sources, liking stories, choosing “Fewer stories like this” and hiding a source, and it mentions no sort-by-date setting. Those are hints to a ranking system, which is why muting a topic there never sticks.

Source: Google News Help

Instagram

Instagram has a help article titled “Steps to switch to Following or Favorites feed on Instagram”, about viewing posts in chronological order. I could not verify the steps themselves from Instagram's help pages today, because the article body did not load for me. Look for that article title in Instagram's Help Center.

Source: Instagram Help Center (title only)

X

I could not verify this from X's help pages today. Its help site refused my request, so I will not describe the Following tab from memory.

Bluesky

I could not verify from Bluesky's help pages today that the Following feed is chronological. What Bluesky does say is that Discover is “customized for what you like to see”, mixing trending posts with accounts you follow and accounts near your social graph. That is a ranked feed, so Following is the one to look for.

Source: Bluesky: custom feeds

Mastodon

Mastodon's documentation describes the home timeline as statuses from users and hashtags you follow. I could not verify from its docs today that the order is strictly newest first, because they do not state the sort order. Mastodon is the one place on this list where following-only is the design rather than a setting.

Source: Mastodon documentation: timelines

The durable answer

Assemble the feed yourself.

The toggles above all live inside someone else's product. The company can move them, rename them, reset them or remove them, and it does. A feed you assemble yourself does not have that problem, because no one else is choosing the order.

The open web already supports this. Most news sites, blogs, podcasts and YouTube channels publish an RSS feed, and Lemmy, Mastodon and Bluesky can be followed the same way. A feed lists items in the order they were published. There is no engagement score in it to optimize.

That is the whole idea. You choose the sources, they publish in order, and you read until there is nothing new. Nobody is guessing what will keep you scrolling.

Where Muuted fits

Option four: Muuted.

An RSS reader built for exactly this: your sources in published order, muted words (and Pro junk filters) instead of a ranker, and a clear “you're caught up” when the new stories end.

No ranking, by construction

Nothing is boosted or buried for engagement.

Your sources in published order, muted words (and Pro junk filters) instead of a ranker.

In practice, you pick the sources you trust: sites, RSS, YouTube channels, podcasts, Lemmy, Mastodon and Bluesky. You mute a word once and it is muted across all of them. The feed runs in the order things were published, and it stops when you're caught up. The free plan covers 100 sources and 10 muted words; Pro is $4/mo.

Questions

FAQ

Is a chronological feed really better than a ranked one?

Better for reading the news, yes: you can tell what's new, you can finish, and nothing is resurfaced to provoke a reaction. Ranked feeds optimize for time spent — which is the opposite of being done.

Do I have to give up filtering without an algorithm?

No — you filter by rules instead. Muted words you choose, plus junk filters Muuted maintains on Pro, all visible and reversible, instead of a ranker guessing.

What about breaking news?

Your sources still publish it and it still arrives at the top — newest first. What changes is that nothing decides breaking news should bury everything else you follow.

Which RSS reader should I pick?

Any of them beats a ranked feed. They differ most on filtering and price — see the full comparison of Muuted, Feedly, Inoreader, NewsBlur, Feedbin, Readwise Reader, The Old Reader and Apple News.

Can I turn the algorithm off in Google News?

No. Google News has controls to follow topics and sources and to show fewer stories, but I did not find a way to sort it by date on Google's help page. Those controls are hints to the ranking, not a chronological feed.

Will the chronological setting on a social app stay on?

Often not. Facebook's own help page says the Feeds view resets when you leave and reopen the app. Treat these toggles as a habit you repeat, not a setting you set once.

What do I need to build a feed without an algorithm myself?

A list of sources that publish in order, usually through an RSS feed, plus a place that shows them newest first and tells you when you've reached the end. Muuted does that part, and lets you mute words once across all of it.

No-algorithm news
Your sources. Published order. A real ending.

Start with 100 sources and 10 muted words free. Founding Pro is $4/mo or $36/yr.

Try Muuted free →

Note — Competitor prices and plan limits on this page were checked as of September 2026 and come from each provider's own public pricing page. Other companies change their pricing whenever they like — check theirs before you decide.